Living soil with root networks

The platform

The compound restores soil. The platform proves it did.

The product is biological — region-specific microbial consortia formulated to the field. The platform is the measurement and selection system around it: it picks the right consortium, tracks what changes, and makes the outcome legible to a farmer, an auditor, and a finance ministry.

Land Twin

Every field becomes a living model of itself.

A continuously updated digital representation of the soil, water, biology and productivity of every hectare under management. The twin is how the system selects which consortium the field needs — and how anyone downstream can see what changed.

Field BX-204 · 142 ha · Winter wheat
68 / 100
Current productive capacity
84 / 100
Target productive capacity (Yr 3)
+28–38%
Modelled yield uplift
−35–42%
Modelled synthetic N
Soil biology6282
Organic matter5578
Water retention7188
Nutrient efficiency6481
Root health7086
Resilience7489

Soil condition

Texture, chemistry, biology — fused from wet lab, sensors, and remote sensing.

Water condition

Field capacity, infiltration, drought-stress trajectory by zone.

Biological condition

Microbiome composition tracked against the regional reference soil.

Productivity condition

Yield potential modelled against realized output, season over season.

Risk condition

Drought, salinity, compaction, disease — quantified, not described.

Productivity Index

A score for the productive capacity of land.

A 0–100 score that quantifies the biological, chemical, and physical capacity of a field to produce food — and, just as importantly, how that capacity is trending season over season.

76
HPI · Gold band
Soil biology
22%
Microbial diversity, fungal-to-bacterial ratio, enzymatic activity.
Organic matter
18%
Soil organic carbon, particulate fractions, humic stability.
Water retention
16%
Field capacity, infiltration rate, plant-available water.
Nutrient efficiency
16%
Cycling rates for N, P, K; uptake efficiency vs. applied.
Root health
14%
Rooting depth, mycorrhizal colonization, rhizosphere activity.
Productivity resilience
14%
Variance under drought, heat, and input-restricted seasons.

Scoring is methodology-transparent. Components, weights, and reference soils are published per region. A qualified third party can inspect every input to the score — including a sovereign client.

0–39
Bronze
40–59
Silver
60–79
Gold
80–100
Platinum

How we move the score

Diagnostics → prescription → application → monitoring.

01

Diagnostics

Wet-lab soil chemistry + biology, drone NDVI, satellite, sensors, weather, water, historical yield.

02

Prescription

Region-specific models fuse the signals and pick the consortium, dose, and cadence for the field.

03

Application

The selected consortium is delivered through existing equipment, integrated with planting and irrigation.

04

Continuous monitoring

Biology, water, yield, and economics tracked every season. Protocols adapt. The score improves.

A note on scientific honesty

Biology is not magic. We frame outcomes as ranges, publish methodology, and validate in the field before we promise it to a farmer or a finance ministry.